State v. Robinson
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant contends the trial court erred in denying his request for a transcript of his sister’s trial. We disagree.
It is established that all defendants, including indigent parties, are entitled to transcripts when appealing to a higher court or upon retrial when necessary for an effective defense. See State v. Reid, 312 N.C. 322, 321 S.E. 2d 880 (1984); State v. Rankin, 306 N.C. 712, 295 S.E. 2d 416 (1982); State v. McNeill, 33 N.C. App. 317, 235 S.E. 2d 274 (1977). Defendant, however, is asking for the transcript of another. There is no statute or precedent which requires…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
- State v. RankinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
- State v. McNeillCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
- State v. ReidSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
- State v. WoodsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- McKibbon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- State v. CodyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- State v. HartCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
- State v. McCoyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State v. BurtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.