Legal Opinion

Cobb v. York Ice MacHinery Corporation

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1935No. 7 Div. 295PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

The original summons was issued by, and returnable to, the Cherokee county circuit court, while the copy served upon the defendant bore the word “Etowah” instead of “Cherokee.” After this, and before the trial, another summons was served on the defendant which conformed to the original and showed the suit to be in Cherokee and not Etowah county. Whether this was regular matters not, as the defendant, upon.the execution of the writ of detinue, executed, a forthcoming bond showing that the proceeding was in Cherokee county. This was equivalent to a personal appearance by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. York Manufacturing Co. v. ColleySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. American Amusement Co v. East Lake Chutes Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1911
  3. George M. Muller Manufacturing Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  4. Puffer Manufacturing Co. v. KellySupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  5. Broaddus v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. Southern Natural Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  2. Wallace Const. Co. v. Industrial Boiler Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  3. Loudonville Milling Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1948
  4. State v. Plantation Pipe Line CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1956
  5. M. & R. Construction Company, a Partnership Composed of Jack A. Roberts and Jack A. Roberts, Individually v. National Homes CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API