Legal Opinion

Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Myers

California Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1931No. Docket No. S.F. 14111PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the controller and treasurer respectively of the city of Los Angeles to draw a warrant for and pay to the petitioner the principal amount theretofore paid by the petitioner in satisfaction of a judgment on a forfeited bail bond entered against the petitioner pursuant to sections 1305 and 1306 of the Penal Code. The matter is submitted on a general demurrer to the petition and briefs filed by the petitioner and by amicios curiae, the county of Los Angeles.

It appears from'the petition that on or about the twenty-ninth day of April, 1929, there was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Quong Ham Wah Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Mundell v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Seaboard Surety Corp. of America v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Lelande v. LoweryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Mendoza v. Small Claims Court of Los Angeles Judicial DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Takahashi v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. People v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Fox-Woodsum Lumber Co. v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API