Legal Opinion

Thomas D. Murphy Co. v. Exchange National Bank of Hastings

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1906No. 14,305PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the district court for Adams county: Ed L. Adams, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Duppie, C.

On April 4, 1902, The Exchange National Bank of Hastings, Nebraska, gave an order to the Thomas D. Murphy Company for 250 calendars and 250 tubes to be deliv*574ered on or about December 1 of that year. The order provided that it was not subject to countermand and that neither party should be bound by any verbal contract. On April 28, 1902, the bank wrote the Murphy company as follows: “We wish hereby to countermand our order for calendars placed with your Mr Kain on April 23. Total amount of bill $28.50. Please take notice.” In reply to this letter the Murphy company refused to cancel…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Funke v. AllenNebraska Supreme Court · 1898
  2. McCormick Harvesting Machine Co. v. BalfanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Backes v. SchlickNebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Trinidad Asphalt Manufacturing Co. v. Buckstaff Bros. Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1910
  3. McCrea v. FordColorado Court of Appeals · 1913
  4. McCrea v. FordColorado Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API