Legal Opinion
AlarMax Distributors, Inc. v. Resideo Technologies, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 31, 2025No. 2:22-cv-01597Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ALARMAX DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ) ) Plaintiff, ) Civil Action No. 2:22-cv-01597 ) vs. ) Chief Judge Cathy Bissoon ) RESIDEO TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW In this lawsuit, Plaintiff, AlarMax Distributors, Inc. (“AlarMax” or “Plaintiff"), seeks a declaratory judgment that Defendant Resideo Technologies, Inc. (“Resideo”) is bound by the 2004 Settlement Agreement (“2004 Agreement”) between Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”) and AlarMax. (Doc. 1). Having conducted a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- MedImmune, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Auto-Owners Insurance Company v. Stevens & Ricci IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2016
- Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Michael D. TarbuckCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.