Legal Opinion

Fong, Auditor v. Sapienza, Judge

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1951No. 2854PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

TOWSE, J.

(Le Baron, J., dissenting.)

This is a proceeding invoking the original jurisdiction of this court upon a question arising under a writ of mandamus directed to an inferior court.

The proceeding is exclusively statutory. Under the heading of “Extraordinary Legal Remedies,” chapter 211, Revised Laws of Hawaii 1945, defines the nature, object, procedural practices and the criteria for determination of the sufficiency of the application, the alternative writ, the return and the peremptory writ of mandamus. It declares that the object of the writ is to “prevent a…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re WaterhouseHawaii Supreme Court · 1860
  2. Ivers v. PerryHawaii Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Gannett Pacific Corp. v. RichardsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. ShintakuHawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State Ex Rel. Marsland v. TownHawaii Supreme Court · 1983
  4. James W. Glover, Ltd. v. FongHawaii Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Akana v. DamonHawaii Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API