Legal Opinion
Bernard v. Rose
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided August 17, 2011No. 3D10-1048PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSuarez, J.
Daryl Bernard seeks to reverse a final order denying his motion to reopen his suit against Donald Rose. We affirm.
Mr. Bernard initially filed suit against his former attorney, Mr. Rose, on July 29, 2004. On October 28, 2004, defendant filed a motion for extension of time to file a response. This motion was the only record activity until November 16, 2005, when Mr. Bernard filed a “non-military affidavit.” On January 4, 2006, the trial court sua sponte filed a motion that required Bernard to show good cause, in writing, at least five days before the scheduled hearing, as to why the case should…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Wilds v. PermenterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Haire v. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
- Amendments to the Rules of Judicial AdministrationSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
- Larybar, Inc. v. City of Miami BeachDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
3Cited by5 opinions
- In Re Justice of the Peace WilliamsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2012
- Morin Magloire and Germain Jean Claude v. The Bank of New YorkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
- Goodman v. GoodmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- JACK KACHKAR v. U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, etc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
- Schaffer v. First BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011