Cohen v. Cohen
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Atkinson, Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts.) The allegations of the amendment to the effect that the agreement to sell the business, which was reduced to writing, was m contemplation of separation of the petitioner and the defendant were averments of facts and were not contradictory to the express terms of the written agreement.
The allegations of the amendment setting forth the reconciliation of the parties were not subject to demurrer on the grounds that there were no allegations of any consideration, or of the terms of the mutual agreement of the parties, or how the new agreement…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Collier v. CollierSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- Hughes v. CobbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Georgia Railroad Bank & Trust Co. v. Liberty National Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Pope v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924
- Pardue Medicine Co. Inc. v. PardueSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Dorsey v. GreenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Parnell v. WootenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- Vlass v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Tucker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953