Bohemia Lumber Co. v. Eimco Corp.
District Court, D. Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
KILKENNY, District Judge.
The issues raised on the defendant’s motion to quash the service of process are:(1) Does Oregon law permit the service of process on the Corporation Commissioner on the facts presented ?(2) Was defendant doing business in Oregon, to an extent which would subject it to the jurisdiction of the Oregon Courts ?
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff’s complaint charges the defendant with numerous fraudulent representations made by defendant’s agents to plaintiff in the State of Oregon.
From the evidence before me, I find that defendant, during the period of time in question, engaged…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- S. R. Smythe Co. v. Ft. Worth Glass & Sand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
- S. R. Smythe Co. v. Ft. Worth Glass & Sand Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1912
- Eclipse Fuel Engineering Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hiersche v. Seamless Rubber Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1963
- Rake v. City Lumber Co. of Bridgeport, Inc.District Court, D. Oregon · 1967
- Stewart v. Allied Construction & Engineering Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 1968