Buhner v. Reusse
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for Murray county to recover $5,000 for malicious prosecution. The case was tried before Nelson, J., who when plaintiff rested dismissed the action. From an order denying his motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.
The action was dismissed when plaintiff rested. The appeal is from the order denying plaintiff’s motion for a new trial.
Plaintiff sued, alleging that defendants conspired together for the purpose of ruining his business, and to that end maliciously and without probable cause instituted criminal proceedings against him for the alleged violation of a village ordinance. Defendants answered separately. The facts as developed at the trial are srrbstantially these: Plaintiff, a resident of the village of Fulda, for many years raised flowers, vegetables *451and garden stuff which, he peddled in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stacey v. EmerySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Smith v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
- Burton v. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Manitoba Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1885
- Skeffington v. EylwardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Cox v. LauritsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Linder v. FosterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- City of Houston v. FreedmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Hoffman v. HastingsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1935
- Dallas Ry. & Terminal Co. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.