Legal Opinion
Lapp v. Reeder Public School District No. 3
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 1, 1992No. Civ. 910421PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHNSON, Justice.
Aaron and Cindy Lapp appeal from a district court judgment which affirmed an order of the Department of Public Instruction [Department] holding that the Lapps were not entitled to receive boarding care payments from the Southwest Multi-Dis-trict Special Education Unit for their daughter, Lisa Lapp. We reverse the judgment of the district court and remand for consideration of the Lapps’ request for attorney fees.
The parties have stipulated to the facts. Before the 1988-89 school year, Aaron and Cindy, and their two daughters, Lisa and Jennifer, lived within the boundaries of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Special Education Division of the Department of Public Instruction v. G. H.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Witthauer v. Burkhart Roentgen, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- International Minerals & Chemical Corp. v. HeitkampNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987
- Redwood Village Partnership, Ltd. v. North Dakota Department of Human ServicesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bismarck Public School District 1 v. State Ex Rel. North Dakota Legislative AssemblyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
- Hallissey v. School Administrative District No. 77Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Lapp v. Reeder Public School District No. 3North Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- City of Fargo v. MalmeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Bismarck Public School District 1 v. State Ex Rel. North Dakota Legislative AssemblyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.