Legal Opinion

Bernier v. Household Finance Corp.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 10, 1944Published

1Opinion of the CourtMorrison, J.

This is a motion to dismiss the complaint under rule 108 of the Eules of Civil Practice. The complaint alleges, for a first cause of action, that the plaintiffs borrowed the sum of $220 from the defendant, a licensed lender doing business in this State, under article IX of the Banking Law of the State of Hew York; that as security for said loan, the plaintiffs gave the defendant their promissory note in said sum of $220, payable with interest at the rate of 2%% per month on the first $100 and 2% per month on the remaining principal balance; that as further security for the repayment of the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Household Finance Corp. v. GoldringAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942
  2. Household Finance Corporation v. GoldringNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
  3. Mercantile Factors Corp. v. Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  4. Martorano v. Capital Finance Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1942
  5. Stuback v. SussmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API