Legal Opinion
Siepel v. Bank of America, N.A.
District Court, E.D. Missouri
Decided December 27, 2006No. Civil No. 05-2393 (PAM)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAGNUSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on several Motions.1 For the following reasons, the Court grants in part Defendants’ Motion for Stay and for Costs and Fees, denies Plaintiffs’ Motions for Sanctions, grants Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss, and denies Plaintiffs’ Motion for Leave to file a Second Amended Complaint.
BACKGROUND
A. The Amended Complaint
Plaintiffs are present or former beneficiaries of trusts and other financial accounts maintained by Defendant Bank of America, N.A. (“Bank”). They commenced this action on behalf of themselves and the following putative class:
Al…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Potter v. Janus Investment FundDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Disher v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2007
- Espenscheid v. DIRECTSAT USA, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2010
- In Re Franklin Mutual Funds Fee LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2007
- Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.