Legal Opinion
Espenscheid v. DIRECTSAT USA, LLC
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Decided April 13, 2010No. 09-cv-625-bbcPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
In this proposed class and collective action for monetary and injunctive relief, plaintiffs Aaron Espenscheid, Gary Idler and Ricardo Bolano contend that defendants DirectSat USA, LLC and UniTek, LLC violated FLSA and certain wage and overtime compensation laws of Wisconsin, Minnesota and Pennsylvania. Plaintiffs bring this lawsuit as a class action on behalf of four separate classes of installation technicians employed or formerly employed by defendants: (1) a nationwide opt-in class for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), 29…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Stewart Organization, Inc. v. Ricoh Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Knepper v. Rite Aid Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Butler v. DIRECTSAT USA, LLCDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2011
- Driscoll v. George Washington UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Calderon v. GEICO General InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2012
- Mateos v. Select Energy Services, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2013