Tilghman v. Sykes
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
THREADGILL, C.
In the trial court plaintiffs in error were defendants and defendant in error was plaintiff, and, for convenience, the parties will be referred to herein as they appeared there.
Plaintiff brought suit against the defendants claiming an undivided one-half interest in and to the following described real estate and asking that the title to same be quieted in him, to wit: W.% of W.% of S.W.^ of section 22; S.E.% of S. E.%; S.E.% of N. E.% of S. E% of section 21, T. 2 S., R. 3 W., in Carter county.
(The plaintiff claimed title by a warranty deed executed and delivered to him…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ohio Oil Company v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Rich v. DonegheySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Kolachny v. GalbreathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Frank Oil Co. v. Belleview Gas & Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Guaranty State Bank of Okmulgee v. PrattSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Town of Red Fork v. Gantt-Baker Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Harmon v. NofireSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Miller v. GregorySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- McKown v. HaughtSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
- Campbell v. PeerySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.