Jenks v. Richardson
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern Ohio
Action by Bobert H. Jenlts, Guy Gray, and others against Mark Iiichardson to recover money lost at gambling.
1Opinion of the Court
RICKS, District Judge.
This case comes before the court upon a motion Jiled by the defendant, Mark Bichardson, to discharge the attachment heretofore issued in this case; against the property of the said Bichardson. Ten reasons are assigned why this attachment should be dissolved. Many of those go to the sufficiency of the facts set forth in the petition to entitle the plaintiffs to maintain their cause of action, and it therefore becomes important, in the first place, to consider how far these 10 grounds for dissolving the attachment can be considered on such motion.
It is well settled in Ohio…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barber v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Burnham v. FisherSupreme Court of Vermont · 1853
- Flood v. RandallSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1881
- Malacarne v. City of Yonkers Parking AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
3Cited by2 opinions
- Armstrong & Co. v. IrizarrySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1921
- Armstrong & Co. v. IrizarrySupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1921