Legal Opinion
First Tennessee Bank Nat. Assn. v. Newham
Nebraska Supreme Court
Decided February 27, 2015No. S-14-326PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets FIRST TENNESSEE BANK NAT. ASSN. v. NEWHAM 273 Cite as
290 Neb. 273
the name of the offense, as designated by the Legislature.10 The name of the crime does not change or affect its elements. And those elements control our review. When reviewing the suf- ficiency of the evidence to support a conviction, the relevant question for an appellate court is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.11 Here, both elements of the crime…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kennedy v. Plan Administrator for DuPont Savings & Investment PlanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bendix Autolite Corp. v. Midwesco Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Gary W. Bowen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Bowen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2001
- Andres v. McNeil Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jordan v. LSF8 Master Participation TrustNebraska Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. CoveyNebraska Supreme Court · 2015
- Hopkins v. HopkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- In re Change of Name of DruckenmillerNebraska Supreme Court · 2024
- Jordan v. LSF8 Master Participation TrustNebraska Supreme Court · 2018