Legal Opinion

In re: Polaris Marketing, Sales Practices, and Products Liability Litigation

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided March 6, 2019No. 0:18-cv-00939Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA In re Polaris Marketing, Sales Practices, Case No. 18-cv-0939 (WMW/DTS) and Products Liability Litigation. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS In this consolidated putative class action litigation, Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiffs’ amended complaint pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 9(b) and 12(b)(6) for failure to plead fraud with particularity and failure to state a claim on which relief can be granted. (Dkt. 42.) For the reasons addressed below, the motion is granted in part and denied…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Blankenship v. USA Truck, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API