Legal Opinion

Sussex Commons Associates, LLC v. Rutgers

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 25, 2010PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

FUENTES, J.A.D.

Plaintiffs Sussex Commons Associates, LLC, and Howard Buer-kle filed a formal request under the Open Public Records Act *540(“OPRA”), N.J.S.A. 47:1A-1 to -13, with the Custodian of Records for Rutgers, the State University, seeking access to eighteen categories of documents concerning the Environmental Law Clinic (Clinic) operated by Rutgers Law School in Newark. The request sought documents related to the Clinic’s finances and its representation of two private citizens’ groups that were opposing plaintiffs’ proposed development of an outlet…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Manalapan Realty v. Township Committee of the Township of ManalapanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Right to Choose v. ByrneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1982
  3. Mason v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. Burnett v. County of BergenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
  5. Brown v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sussex Commons Associates, LLC v. RutgersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
  2. Newark Morning v. Sports & Expo.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
  3. Ernest Bozzi v. City of Atlantic CityNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API