Legal Opinion

In the Matter of Stokley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1954No. 5PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNboune, J.

In brief of defendant filed presently in this Court it is stated that the State contends that when a criminal action is brought from an inferior court to the Superior Court on certiorari, the Superior Court can act only as a court of review, and must act on the facts as they appear of record. This is not debatable. S. v. King, 222 N.C. 137, 22 S.E. 2d 241.

Certiorari, as a substitute for an appeal, must be applied for in apt time, S. v. Lawrence, 81 N.C. 522; Taylor v. Johnson, 171 N.C. 84, 87 S.E. 981,—ordinarily at the next term of the supervising court. Surely eleven years, from 8 July,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  2. State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Taylor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  4. State v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Sanford v. SOUTHERN OIL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Kelly v. PiperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. In re the Suspension of the Right to Practice Law of PalmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Midtown Auto Sales, Inc. v. Motorists Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API