In the Matter of Stokley
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtWiNboune, J.
In brief of defendant filed presently in this Court it is stated that the State contends that when a criminal action is brought from an inferior court to the Superior Court on certiorari, the Superior Court can act only as a court of review, and must act on the facts as they appear of record. This is not debatable. S. v. King, 222 N.C. 137, 22 S.E. 2d 241.
Certiorari, as a substitute for an appeal, must be applied for in apt time, S. v. Lawrence, 81 N.C. 522; Taylor v. Johnson, 171 N.C. 84, 87 S.E. 981,—ordinarily at the next term of the supervising court. Surely eleven years, from 8 July,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
- State v. . KingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Taylor v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
- State v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Sanford v. SOUTHERN OIL COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Kelly v. PiperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- In re the Suspension of the Right to Practice Law of PalmerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1978
- Midtown Auto Sales, Inc. v. Motorists Mutual Insurance, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Greene County1983