Legal Opinion

Frost v. State ex rel. Reeves

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1914No. 22,345PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Prom Hancock Circuit Court; William A. Rough, Judge. Action for mandate by tbe State of Indiana, on tbe relation of Prank H. Reeves, against Abram W. Frost, .Trustee of Center School Township of Hancock County. Prom a judgment for relator, tbe defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

On March 11, 1907, tbe legislature passed an act concerning tbe discontinuance of public schools in which it was provided that “the township trustees shall discontinue and abandon all schools under their charge at which the average daily attendance during the last preceding school year has been twelve (12) pupils or fewer; and said trustees may discontinue and abandon all schools at which the average daily attendance during the last preced*582ing school year has been fifteen (15) pupils or fewer: Provided, The conditions as to roads, streams and bridges permit of such discontinuance.” Acts 1907…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Rignier v. BlackIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Nelson v. State, ex rel. MartinIndiana Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Leedy v. IdleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Woodward v. State ex rel. AtkinsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  3. McClellan v. State ex rel. BryantIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State ex rel. Alexander v. StevensIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Todd v. GoshornIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API