Legal Opinion

Clark v. Hill

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOwen, J.

The petitioners are the proprietors of a show or entertainment popularly known as a carnival, consisting of seven distinct acts or performances, such as a shooting gallery, a circus side-show, a motordrome, two fun houses, a Ferris wheel, a merry-go-round, etc. On the 16th day of July, 1931, they applied to the defendants as Commissioners of the Department of Agriculture and Markets of the state of Wisconsin, under the provisions of sec. 129.14, Stats., for a showman’s license and tendered therefor the sum of $20. The license was refused because the commissioners construed sec. 129.14 as…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lessig v. LessigWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Wisconsin Creameries, Inc. v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Bragg v. BlewettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Ellis v. Barron CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rommell v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
  2. In Re the Eligibility for Unemployment Benefits of FoyWashington Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API