Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re the Eligibility for Unemployment Benefits of Foy

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 4, 1941No. 28240Published

1DissentSimpson, J.

(dissenting) — In my opinion, the majority incorrectly overruled respondent’s motion to dismiss this appeal.

In order to make clear my position concerning the precise question involved, I briefly review the facts: (1) Three claimants applied for unemployment compensation benefits, alleging former employment with respondent; (2) from an adverse departmental ruling, claimants appealed to the statutory tribunal which held in their favor; (3) at respondent’s request, the commissioner reviewed the tribunal’s decision which he affirmed; (4) respondent then appealed to the superior court where…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williams v. BabbCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Cairns v. DonaheyWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  3. Kirchoff v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
  4. Appeal of SpencerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  5. Albrecht v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API