Legal Opinion
City of Philadelphia v. Stepan Chemical Co.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 1, 1989No. Civ. A. 81-0851, 83-5493PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
DITTER, District Judge.
Before me is the motion for summary judgment of defendants Nathan Auritt and Riva Snyderman, trustees of the Sarah Kate Neuman Trust. Plaintiff, the City of Philadelphia, contends that the trust is the “successor-in-interest” to Eastern States Paint and Varnish Company, a former Pennsylvania corporation which allegedly “generated hazardous waste which was illegally deposited on the Enterprise Avenue landfill,” Am.Compl. at 4, a parcel of land owned by the City. The City seeks response costs and consequential damages from Auritt, Snyderman, and the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Philadelphia Electric Company v. Hercules, Inc. And Gould, Inc. Appeal of Hercules, IncCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Dawejko v. Jorgensen Steel Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
- Polius v. Clark Equipment Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- Baker v. GeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- Butler County v. BrockerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Witco Corp. v. BeekhuisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Marsh v. RosenbloomCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Steego Corp. v. RavenalDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1993
- Pfohl Brothers Landfill Site Steering Committee v. Allied Waste Sys., Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- United States v. SCA Services of Indiana, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1993
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.