Legal Opinion

Weis-Fricker Mahogany Co. v. King

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided July 28, 1939PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This cause has been tried three times in the Circuit Court and has been to this Court on two former writs of error. (124 Fla. 272, 168 So. 858, and 131 Fla. 342, 177 So. 313.) It is an action at law to recover damages for the negligent burning of the house, filling station and outhouses of the plaintiff by the defendant. A fuller statement of the facts will be found in the previous cases.

It is first contended on this appeal that the judgment-should be reversed because in the former appeal the case was submitted to the jury on five counts, an'd the jury 'found for the defendant on all but the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. King v. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
  2. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co. v. KingSupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  3. Payne v. McKinnonSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  4. Reed, Et Vir v. the American Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J.Supreme Court of Florida · 1937
  5. St. Johns & Halifax Railroad v. RansomSupreme Court of Florida · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Indamer Corp. v. CrandonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  2. Shepherd v. Finer Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API