Legal Opinion

Reed, Et Vir v. the American Ins. Co. of Newark, N.J.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided May 20, 1937PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

In this case the plaintiff in error brought suit on a policy of fire insurance. After a trial on the merits, the jury found a verdict for the insurance company. Plaintiff below has appealed.

We are of the opinion that plaintiff below sufficiently proved that she was the sole and unconditional owner of the property within the meaning of the policy requiring sole and unconditional ownership as a condition to the insurance when she showed that she had unqualifiedly agreed to buy it, and the vendor had unqualifiedly agreed to sell it, at a fixed price and on terms, pursuant to which she had…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Phenix Insurance v. HilliardSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  2. King v. Weis-Patterson Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1936
  3. Insurance Co. of North America v. EricksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1905

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Fireman's Fund Indemnity Co. v. PerrySupreme Court of Florida · 1942
  2. Mutual Life Ins. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  3. City of Jacksonville v. WaldrepSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Commercial U. Ins. Co. of NY v. Padrick Chevrolet Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  5. Lane v. WhiteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API