Legal Opinion
Koraitem v. Microchip Technology, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 8, 2025No. 5:24-cv-00462Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 SAN JOSE DIVISION 8 9 KAMAL KORAITEM, Case No. 5:24-cv-00462-EJD 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR 11 v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12 MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGY, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 73 Defendant. 13 14 Defendant Microchip Technology, Inc., (“Defendant”) terminated Plaintiff Kamal 15 Koraitem (“Plaintiff”) because of his social media posts regarding the Israel-Palestine conflict. 16 Separate Statement of Facts (“Fact” or “Pl.’s Resp. to Fact”), ECF No. 104-1.1 Plaintiff alleges 17 that his termination…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Patricia Fuller v. City of Oakland, California George Hart Antonio RomeroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Federal Trade Commission v. StefanchikCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Torres v. City of MaderaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.