Illinois Steel Co. v. Bilot
Wisconsin Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C.' Lijdwig, Judge. Action in ejectment. The complaint was in the usual form. The answer contained a plea of the twenty-year statute of limitations. Sec. 4207, Stats. 1898. The defense thus pleaded was the one relied upon on the trial.
Read the full summary
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court of Milwaukee county: J. C.' Lijdwig, Judge. Action in ejectment. The complaint was in the usual form. The answer contained a plea of the twenty-year statute of limitations. Sec. 4207, Stats. 1898. The defense thus pleaded was the one relied upon on the trial. To maintain plaintiff’s case evidence was produced showing jprwna facie record title in itself of a portion of two lots in fractional section 33, township 7, range 22 E., and competent evidence that such portion includes the premises in dispute. The evidence on the part of defendants was to…
1Opinion
A motion for a rehearing was duly submitted in this case and was decided March 19,1901, the following opinion being filed:
MaRShall, J\
The argument on the motion for a rehearing has received that consideration which the learned counsel for respondent earnestly invoked for it, without our being able to indorse.the reasons assigned for changing the judgment entered, though such reasons are urged with such earnestness and confidence that a departure from the usual course in disposing of such matters, by filing an opinion pointing out what appears to be the weakness thereof, seems advisable.
As a…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lessee of Ewing v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- Brown v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1899
- Worthley v. BurbanksIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Trustees of the Freeholders & Commonalty v. KirkNew York Court of Appeals · 1881
- Draper v. ShootSupreme Court of Missouri · 1857
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.