Legal Opinion

Zigas v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1981No. Civ. 50140PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FEINBERG, J.

This case is before us on a petition for writ of mandate. Because the issues involved appeared to be of considerable public importance and of first impression, we issued an alternative writ. We now hold that the relief sought should be granted.

Petitioners are tenants of an apartment building at 2000 Broadway in San Francisco, which was financed with a federally insured mortgage in excess of $5 million, pursuant to the National Housing Act (12 U.S.C. § 1701 et seq.) (the Act) and the regulations promulgated thereunder (24 C.F.R. § 207 et seq.). They seek in a class action,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Clearfield Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. Porter v. Warner Holding Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  5. Miree v. DeKalb CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Marina Tenants Ass'n v. Deauville Marina Development Co.California Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. In re Anthem, Inc. Data Breach LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2016
  4. Souza v. Westlands Water DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Technicable Video Sys. v. AmericableDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API