Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hamilton

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 27, 2026No. 32ag/24Published

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Judith Marie Hamilton, AG No. 32, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Killough, J. ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT – DISCIPLINE – DISBARMENT – Respondent Judith Marie Hamilton violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1 (Competence), 19-301.3 (Diligence), 19-301.4 (Communication), 19-301.5(a) (Fees), 19- 301.15(c) (Safekeeping of property), 19-301.16(d) (Declining or terminating representation), 19-308.1(b) (Bar admission and disciplinary matters), and 19-308.4(a) and (d) (Misconduct). These violations arose from Respondent’s…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API