Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. Hamilton
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Judith Marie Hamilton, AG No. 32, September Term, 2024. Opinion by Killough, J. ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT – DISCIPLINE – DISBARMENT – Respondent Judith Marie Hamilton violated Maryland Attorneys’ Rules of Professional Conduct 19-301.1 (Competence), 19-301.3 (Diligence), 19-301.4 (Communication), 19-301.5(a) (Fees), 19- 301.15(c) (Safekeeping of property), 19-301.16(d) (Declining or terminating representation), 19-308.1(b) (Bar admission and disciplinary matters), and 19-308.4(a) and (d) (Misconduct). These violations arose from Respondent’s…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. BriscoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HodesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.