Legal Opinion
Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. City of Carson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 2, 2004No. 02-56213PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FISHER, Circuit Judge.
“We are called upon to consider, yet again, a takings challenge to mobile home rent control laws.” Levald, Inc. v. City of Palm Desert, 998 F.2d 680, 683 (9th Cir.1993). Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. (“Carson Harbor”) is a large mobile home park located in the City of Carson (“City”). This case arises out of the City’s handling of Carson Harbor’s June 2000 and April 2001 applications for rent increases. In June 2000, Carson Harbor applied for *825monthly rent increases ranging from approximately $223 to $241 per mobile home space, but the City’s Mobilehome Park Rental Review…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Williamson County Regional Planning Commission v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- First English Evangelical Lutheran Church v. County of Los AngelesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Palazzolo v. Rhode IslandSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Suitum v. Tahoe Regional Planning AgencySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Chris Taylor v. John ChiangCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Equity Lifestyle Properties, Inc. v. County of San Luis ObispoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Benson v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Ventura Mobilehome Communities Owners Association, an Unincorporated Association v. City of San BuenaventuraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Committee to Protect our Agricultural Water v. Occidental Oil & Gas Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.