Legal Opinion

Celece v. Dunn School

District Court, C.D. California

Decided November 19, 2020No. 2:20-cv-10139Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CELECE, et al., Case No. CV 20-10139 GW (PVCx) 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE 13 v. SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT STATUS BE 14 DUNN SCHOOL, et al., DENIED FOR LACK OF FEDERAL JURISDICTION 15 Defendants. 16 17 On November 3, 2020, “Celece” and “John Doe,” California residents proceeding 18 pro se (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), filed a joint complaint against twelve named Defendants 19 and two unknown Defendants raising twenty-six purported causes of action. 20 (“Complaint,” Dkt. No. 1).…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Harry Franklin v. Ms. Murphy and Hoyt CuppCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  4. Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API