Legal Opinion
Sanghavi v. Paul Revere Life Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 27, 1990No. 13810PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGlass, J.
This appeal concerns the interpretation and application of certain provisions of an income option rider (rider) to a disability insurance policy that was issued by the defendant, The Paul Revere Life Insurance Company (Paul Revere), to the plaintiff, Jagdish Sanghavi.
The parties have agreed, by a stipulation of facts dated October 13,1987, that Paul Revere issued to Sanghavi a disability policy on July 7,1976, that provided for indemnity benefits of $600 per month during the period of disability. For additional consideration, Paul Revere issued a rider to the policy that provided for seven…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. Sperry & Hutchinson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Mead v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Whitfield v. Empire Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- Safeco Insurance v. VetreSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
- Young v. American Fidelity Ins. Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1984
3Cited by22 opinions
- Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Deming v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Rizzo Pool Co. v. Del GrossoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Charles M. Parrot v. The Guardian Life Insurance Company of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Vezina v. Nautilus Pools, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.