Legal Opinion

Alliance for Natural Health US v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 13, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2009-1546Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ALLIANCE FOR NATURAL HEALTH US, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 09-1546 (BAH) KATHLEEN SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Dietary supplement designers and industry groups brought this lawsuit challenging a decision of the Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) to deny a petition for authorization of certain qualified health claims regarding dietary supplements containing vitamin C and vitamin E. The plaintiffs assert the FDA’s decision has violated their First Amendment rights. Invoking both circuit and district…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Serono Labs Inc v. Ferring Pharm. Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
  4. Thompson v. Western States Medical CenterSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Tao v. FreehCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API