Lewith v. Rehmke
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWaste, C. J.
Plaintiff instituted this action to cancel a deed to certain real property and to quiet his title thereto. The complaint alleges that defendant procured the deed from plaintiff by certain threats made at a time when plaintiff was in a weakened mental condition and while defendant was acting as the fiduciary agent of the plaintiff. The cause was tried by the court sitting without a jury. From the judgment entered for defendant the plaintiff prosecuted an appeal. However, the proposed bill of exceptions to be used on such appeal was not prepared or served within the time limited by law.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Waybright v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- O'Brien v. LeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Ingrim v. EppersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Cameron v. Arcata & Mad River RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- California National Bank v. El Dorado Lime & Minerals Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Labarthe v. McRaeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- McNeil v. BlumenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Caminetti v. Edward Brown & SonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Manning v. GavinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Winkler v. WinklerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.