In Re Bagnell
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Per curiam
In this attorney discipline matter, Respondent Gilbert S. Bagnell has been accused of misconduct, including failure to work on a client’s case, failure to communicate with a client, failure to properly terminate representation by protecting a client’s interests, and failure to cooperate with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC). We concur in the Panel’s recommendation, and therefore, disbar Respondent.
I
Respondent Gilbert S. Bagnell was admitted to the Bar in 1991. In 2006, Client hired Respondent to work on a matter against a financial institution over a disputed debt. 1 At the time,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
- In the Matter of SiflySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
- In Re MurphSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re HurseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011