Legal Opinion

In Re Bagnell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 18, 2011No. 27008PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this attorney discipline matter, Respondent Gilbert S. Bagnell has been accused of misconduct, including failure to work on a client’s case, failure to communicate with a client, failure to properly terminate representation by protecting a client’s interests, and failure to cooperate with the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (ODC). We concur in the Panel’s recommendation, and therefore, disbar Respondent.

I

Respondent Gilbert S. Bagnell was admitted to the Bar in 1991. In 2006, Client hired Respondent to work on a matter against a financial institution over a disputed debt. 1 At the time,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re HallSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
  2. In the Matter of SiflySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1983
  3. In Re MurphSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re HurseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API