Legal Opinion · Dissent

Walker v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided April 8, 1926No. 6 Div. 412Published

1DissentThomas, J.

The suit by an administratrix for the wanton injury and death of her intestate was against the defendant corporation and the engineer in charge of the engine causing the injury.

The first, third, and fourth counts charged both defendants with liability as joint tortfeasors, without specific reference therein to the doctrine of respondeat superior. Count 1, for simple negligence, was eliminated by the charge of the court. Count 2 was for the subsequent negligence of the engineer after discovery of the peril of the said intestate. The action of the court was not invoked by defendant to apply the…

2Cases cited83 opinions

  1. Karges Furniture Co. v. Amalgamated Woodworkers Local Union No. 131Indiana Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Illinois Central Ry. Co. v. Murphy's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. JamesTexas Supreme Court · 1889
  4. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. McWhorterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  5. City of Birmingham v. CarleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1915

78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API