Legal Opinion

Miskovsky v. Vrba

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 7, 1919No. 8698PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by Frank Miskovsky against Vac-lav Vrba. Judgment for defendant and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

We are met at the threshold of this case by a motion of the defendant to dismiss this appeal. After several extensions of time to prepare and serve case-made the plaintiff procured an order extending his time five days, allowing the defendant 3 days in which to suggest amendments, and ordering that the case-made be settled upon two days' notice. Counsel for defendant contends that the order that case-made might be settled upon two days' notice is a nullity, and relies upon Allen v. Dillard, 59 Okla. 81, 159 P. 749. In that case it is said:

"A notice to settle case-made, served but 21 hours…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. White v. CrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Kelly v. RoetzelSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. Allis v. Meadow Spring Distilling Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Gross v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  5. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. DietrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Carr v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Stieber v. StieberSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API