Harrison v. Cachelin
Supreme Court of Missouri
Appeal from Si. Louis Land Court. cited Harrison v. Cachelin, 23 Mo. 124; Reilly v. Chouquette, 18 Mo. 225 ; 10 Watts, 142; 4 Whart. 298; 25 Penn. 252. cited Martin v. Whittington, 4 Mo. 518; Campbell v. Hood, 6 Mo. 211; 6 Mo. 250 ; 7 Mo. 220 ; Watts v. Douglas, 10 Mo. 676 ; 19 Mo. 307 ; State v. Anderson, 19 Mo. 246 ; Menkens v. Ovenhouse, 22 Mo. 70 ; Williams v. Dongan, 20 Mo. 186; 5 Mete. 173 ; 9 Mo. 477 ; 18 Mo. 220.
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, Judge
When this case was first before this court (23 Mo. 117) it was decided that the defendants had no title in law or equity, and on the last trial they did not attempt to set up any, but relied solely on the statute of limitations.
*27The court gave the following instruction at the request of the defendants : “ If the jury believe from the evidence that the defendants and those under whom they claim have had open and visible possession of the premises in dispute under a claim of title adverse to the title of the city of Carondelet and of the plaintiff for the period of twenty years next before the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Harrison v. CachelinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1856
3Cited by4 opinions
- Summers v. KellerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1911
- Willis v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1884
- Ickenroth v. St. Louis Transit Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Harrison v. CachelinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1864