Legal Opinion

Willis v. Oregon Railway & Navigation Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1884PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Clackamas Comity.

1Opinion of the Court

By tlie Court,

Lord, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for injuries received by the plaintiff while in the employ of the defendant as a laborer in the construction of a shed on the south side of the dry dock at Oregon City.

By his complaint, the plaintiff attributes his injuries to *258the negligence of the defendant in not providing sound lumber for the scaffolding.

According to the bill of exceptions, the evidence tended to show, in substance, the following state of -facts:

That the plaintiff was in the defendant’s employ, at or about the dry dock at Oregon City, as a common laborer; that…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Hough v. Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Laning v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Gibson v. Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1870
  4. Chicago & North Western Railroad v. SwettIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Malone v. . HathawayNew York Court of Appeals · 1876

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Knahtla v. Oregon Short Line, etc., Ry. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Godvig v. LopezOregon Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Madden's Adm'r v. C. & O. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Nutt v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Criswell v. Railway Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1888

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API