Cerberonics, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FUTEY, Judge.
This government contract case comes before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiff, who initiated this action under the direct access provision of the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C. § 609(a)(1) (1982), seeks monetary relief from the Government under the terms of a service contract with the Department of the Navy. Defendant asserts that this court lacks jurisdiction because the claim(s) at bar differ from the claim(s) previously presented to and decided by the contracting officer. For the reasons discussed hereinafter,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- J.F. Shea Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
- Mark Smith Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1986
- Kunz Construction Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
3Cited by59 opinions
- Scott Timber Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2003
- Miller Elevator Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- North Star Alaska Housing Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- ThermoCor, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996
- Tunica-Biloxi Tribe of La. v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.