Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Flint

California Supreme Court

Decided December 2, 1893No. 15291PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

A judgment was entered denying probate to a certain instrument claimed to be the last will and testament of William C. Flint, deceased, upon the ground that at the time said instrument was signed the testator was not of sound and disposing mind, and also. that said deceased was unduly influenced in the making thereof. The appellant, Annie Flint, wife of the deceased, made a motion for a new trial, which was denied, and this appeal is prosecuted from the order denying such motion. f

The appeal is based upon certain rulings of the court in the admission and rejection of evidence offered during…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thompson v. IshSupreme Court of Missouri · 1889
  2. Fraser v. JennisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Renihan v. . DenninNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
  4. Loder v. . WhelpleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
  5. Westover v. . Aetna Life Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1885

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Loper v. MorrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Harrison v. Sutter Street RailwayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Estate of CasparCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Board of Medical Quality Assurance v. GherardiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Darling v. Pacific Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1925

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API