Legal Opinion
Tri-R Systems, Ltd. v. Friedman & Son, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided July 13, 1982No. Civ. A. No. 79-K-1436PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
KANE, District Judge.
This is an antitrust action. This court has jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. § 15 and 28 U.S.C. § 1337. The plaintiff is a limited partnership in the business of buying and selling waste paper. The defendant, Friedman & Son, Inc., (“Friedman”), is one of the largest independent paper dealers in the country and is a competitor of the *727plaintiff in the paper selling market. The defendants, Southwest Forest Industries, Inc., (“Southwest”) and Tamko Asphalt Products, Inc., of Kansas (“Tamko”) are manufacturers who purchase large quantities of…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Krulewitch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Spencer, White & Prentis Incorporated of Connecticut v. Pfizer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974
- Douglas F. Warner v. Donat Rossignol v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1975
- Anderson v. Francis I. duPont & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Martinmaas v. EngelmannSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Landstrom v. ShaverSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- A-Plus Janitorial & Carpet Cleaning v. the Employers' Workers' Compensation Ass'nSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Pennington v. Harvest Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- Corrigan v. Methodist HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.