Wright v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DOUGLAS, Judge.
These are appeals from two convictions for sale of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD). The punishment was assessed by the court at four years in each case to run concurrently.
The sufficiency of the evidence is not challenged.
Appellant complains solely that the trial court erred in not granting his motion to quash the indictment on the grounds that the Dangerous Drug statute is unconstitutional. The appellant contends that H. B. No. 142, Chapter 437, Acts of 61st Legislature, Regular Session, 1969, violates Article 3, Section 35 of the Constitution of the State of Texas,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- White v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1969
- Thompson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Katz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
3Cited by7 opinions
- Stein v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Peak v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
- Harvey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Green v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.