Legal Opinion

White v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 9, 1969No. 41925PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ONION, Judge.

The offense is sale of a dangerous drug, to wit: lysergic acid diethylamide; the punishment, 5 years, probated. In four grounds of error appellant attacks the constitutionality of the statute under which he was convicted. See Article 726d, V.A.P.C., as amended, 1967 (S.B. No. 17, Acts 1967, 60th Legislature, p. 1847, ch. 720). 1

First, we shall consider appellant’s specific contention that the trial court erred in failing to quash the indictment since the caption or title to the 1967 act amending the Dangerous Drug Act, Article 726d, supra, to include hallucinogens…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Arnold v. LeonardTexas Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Parks v. WestTexas Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Gulf Ins. Co. v. James, St. Treas.Texas Supreme Court · 1945
  4. State Highway Department v. GorhamTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Schlichting v. Texas State Board of Medical ExaminersTexas Supreme Court · 1958

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. Bates v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  2. Ex Parte CrispCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  3. Slagle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. State v. Wofford, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2000
  5. Stein v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API