Legal Opinion

Siegel v. O. M. Scott & Sons Co.

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 15, 1943No. 205PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By GUERNSEY, P.J.

This is an appeal on questions of law, from a judgment of the Common Pleas Court of Union County, Ohio, sustaining a demurrer to the petition of plaintiff, upon the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and dismissing the same, in an action pending-in said court wherein the appellant Alex Siegel was plaintiff, and the appellees The O. M. Scott & Sons Company and Paul Williams weje defendants.

The petition, to which the demurrer was sustained, omitting caption and certain allegations as to the nature and extent of the damages…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Taplin-Rice-Clerkin Co. v. HowerOhio Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Stephenson v. McCurdyOhio Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Zamos v. StroudCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Zenik v. O'BRIENSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  3. Kelsey D. Bartlett v. Dr. Robert E. WeimerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  4. Walsh v. EberleinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Arquette v. State.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2012

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API