Legal Opinion

Fletcher v. U.S. Renal Care, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided March 2, 2017No. 1:15-CV-491PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

SUSAN. J. DLOTT, United States District Judge

This matter is before the Court on Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 22). Plaintiff Steven Fletcher brings this reverse-race discrimination and retaliation case against his former employer, Defendant U.S. Renal Care, Inc. U.S. Renal Care contends that it is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because, among other deficiencies, Fletcher was hot subjected to an adverse employment action. For the reasons that follow, the Court will -GRANT the Motion for Summary Judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Mohamed v. 1st Class Staffing, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2017
  2. Benoist v. Titan Medical Manufacturing, LLC.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2021
  3. Coffee v. Bullitt CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2021
  4. Doran v. McDonaldDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2020
  5. McCarter v. UT-Battelle LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API