Legal Opinion

Bliley v. Kelly

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 20, 1992No. Civ. A. 92-0422PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

GESELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are four members of the U.S. House of Representatives with oversight responsibility for the District of Columbia, who seek a declaratory judgment that a local statute, the Assault Weapon Manufacturing Strict Liability Act of 1990 (“the Liability Act”), D.C. Act. 8-289, is invalid for failure to comply with the Home Rule Act, D.C.Code § 1-201 et seq. The Home Rule Act provides that enactments of the D.C. Council do not become law until Congress has had a chance to review them for thirty legislative days. See D.C.Code 1-233(c)(1). Because the date on…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Donald W. Riegle, Jr., Member, U. S. Senate v. Federal Open Market CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  2. Atkinson v. District of Columbia Board of Elections & EthicsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hon. Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. v. Sharon Pratt Kelly, Mayor of the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API