Legal Opinion

Guy v. Liederbach

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 15, 1980No. 2942PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, Judge:

This appeal from the order of the trial court sustaining appellees’ preliminary objections raises the novel question in Pennsylvania whether a devisee may maintain a cause of action for legal malpractice against counsel for the testator when the devise fails due to improprieties in the execution of the will. We hold that such an action may be maintained and accordingly, we reverse the order of the court of common pleas.

The pertinent facts are as follows. Appellant’s decedent (hereinafter plaintiff) filed a complaint in trespass and in assumpsit on January 23,1976, alleging that…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Allstate Insurance v. FioravantiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Clevenstein v. RizzutoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  4. Martin v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978
  5. Brody v. RubySupreme Court of Iowa · 1978

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Guy v. LiederbachSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  2. Stowe v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Auric v. Continental Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Smith v. GriffithsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Needham v. HamiltonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API