Scheffer v. National Life Insurance Co. of the United States
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Ramsey county, Wilkin, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
When this cause was called for trial in the court below, but before any other act was done toward a trial, the defendant objected to the court proceeding further in the cause, on the ground that it having executed and filed the proper papers^ for a removal of the cause to the circuit court of the United States, the state court had lost jurisdiction.- If the record in the cause showed a loss of jurisdiction, it was error in the court to proceed further. No order for removal was necessary. St. Anthony Falls WaterPower Co. v. King Bridge Co., 23 Minn. 186. The only ground upon which the right of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Life Insurance v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Insurance Co. v. RodelSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Breasted v. . the Farmers' Loan and Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1853
- Eastabrook v. Union Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866
- St. Anthony Falls Water-Power Co. v. Kings Wrought-iron Bridge Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Olsson v. Midland InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
- Staton v. Norfolk & Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1892
- Haines v. Lone Star Shipbuilding Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
- Scarth v. Security Mutual Life SocietySupreme Court of Iowa · 1888
- Blackstone v. Standard Life & Accident InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.